Mr. Brightside wrote:I really don't see how anyone can say there's nowhere left to take Cyndi. Here she is, a girl from a rich family now looking at certain, vast downward mobility, after years in an environment where she was forced to hone further her ability to lie, tested against professionals, lest she be disowned, stalked by a history of thoughtcrime, her arrest precipitated by an attempt on her life, still compelled to harm others, now desperate and spiteful, even as society watches her much more closely. After the vicious and subtle mindgames she played as a naive and basically apathetically cruel high schooler with the whole world in front of her, what will she do now that others are wary, her prospects are few, and she has every reason to be bitter?
What's more, there's an intriguing story of self-realization hinted in snippets, that we've only seen outlined, and even that buried in her own half-truths. There's too little ambiguity in it to tempt the imagination, but just enough to frustrate curiosity. I'd say, past and future, there's a lot more to be told there.
Rebhel wrote:I happen to like Lisa BECAUSE of the way she speaks. If you don't get her, oh well... you are the one missing out.
Tamar wrote:The above isn't meant as a put-down of others' opinions, just as a statement of my own preference.
Valerie wrote:You're in my harem, right?
Tamar wrote:Noticing Cyndi's apparently sudden spike in popularity lately, I just want to go on record as saying I prefer to read about characters who sometimes do bad things and sometimes do good things, in different proportions of bad to good, while being basically decent or at least having a conscience to trouble them when they do bad things. I am less interested in reading stories where the protagonist (not the antagonist) is a person who always does bad things because she's inherently incapable of doing otherwise. I find such characters unrelatable and, if made too much the centre of a narrative for too long, unsatisfying as entertainment.
The above isn't meant as a put-down of others' opinions, just as a statement of my own preference.
Lia S wrote:Valerie is right.
As usual.
TCampbell wrote:Val has a harem, but it's chiefly structured online at the moment.
Valerie wrote:maritza wrote:It'd be true-crime style and my goal would be for half the readership wishing she gets caught and half wishing she's not.
Doitdoitdoitdoitdoit.
Teeeee, let her do iiiiit. D:
Mr. Brightside wrote:I really don't see how anyone can say there's nowhere left to take Cyndi. Here she is, a girl from a rich family now looking at certain, vast downward mobility, after years in an environment where she was forced to hone further her ability to lie, tested against professionals, lest she be disowned, stalked by a history of thoughtcrime, her arrest precipitated by an attempt on her life, still compelled to harm others, now desperate and spiteful, even as society watches her much more closely. After the vicious and subtle mindgames she played as a naive and basically apathetically cruel high schooler with the whole world in front of her, what will she do now that others are wary, her prospects are few, and she has every reason to be bitter?
What's more, there's an intriguing story of self-realization hinted in snippets, that we've only seen outlined, and even that buried in her own half-truths. There's too little ambiguity in it to tempt the imagination, but just enough to frustrate curiosity. I'd say, past and future, there's a lot more to be told there.
TCampbell wrote:Valerie wrote:maritza wrote:It'd be true-crime style and my goal would be for half the readership wishing she gets caught and half wishing she's not.
Doitdoitdoitdoitdoit.
Teeeee, let her do iiiiit. D:
Maritza officially has my permission to do a non-canon Cyndi series. That's for her protection as well as mine: I wouldn't want either of us to have to be bound by the other's decisions.
Lia S wrote:Valerie is right.
As usual.
TCampbell wrote:Val has a harem, but it's chiefly structured online at the moment.
Zanosuke Kurosaki wrote:The only thing about Cyndi is that she's the type of person that bears watching. Preferably, from a great distance. And perhaps through the gun-cameras mounted on the outer walls of your deep, secure bunker.
So, T, here's one no one seems to have covered yet: How are all the parents doing, six Septembers on in their lives?
That's about the most awesome future out of all of them.TCampbell wrote:Linda has become director of social media for a gaming site with a 35-65 female demographic.
Alice Macher wrote:Oh, we're asking T questions again?Here's mine:
Given that the fight and near-breakup between Penny and Aggie ended up overshadowing it...how did the four girls' fight over Stan's status with "the gang" get resolved, if at all? Did Aggie give Stan the film credit he requested? Did Penny and Lisa become enemies, if only temporarily? (I'm assuming that, like Sara and Daphne, they'd have long since gotten over their anger by 2017.)
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest