Twitcher wrote:It's weird, and I must be misremembering, but I'd thought that Guth died earlier in FANS. Did he just move to another department or retire from active duty, and if so, what's he doing nowadays?
retrophrenologist wrote:As i recall, Guth moved away to get his PhD, and is currently changing number theory somewhere, with the aid of his creepy little pedostache.
Incidentally, what's with Guth's moustache, anyway?
IS_Wolf wrote:Did Will ever consider going the Brian Blessed route with his acting career?
And considering how far along the timeline the current Faans universe is, that it might as well be an alternate timeline anyway at this point.
What are the chances of Margaret "Read my shirt" Browning, David "Soulcat" Jones and Roger "The Weird One" Pepitone showing up as members of Aegis?
Roger would seem to fit with the whole Weird Science department they got, what with Fitz running the show there.
Margaret seems mix the best qualities of Beta and Alpha Squad, even if she's not a team player.
Dave... Considering his eye powers, and prior friendship with Rikk, you'd think that he'd relatively high up on the recruitment list.
(Unless of course, Blue has got him locked away somewhere.)
Left out Mike, Marsha and April, considering the awkward history with Will, and Mike being wealthy enough not to need a job anyway.
T. Campbell (yeah, HIM) wrote:If Freemage did not exist, it might have been necessary to invent him.
dianekikiula wrote:My sig is jealous of your sig now.
Valerie wrote:
I'm leaving Paps for you.
Freemage, do you have a fanclub yet, and can I please join?
Thray wrote:Is this the final year for faans?
Bunny Suction wrote:Really sad to hear the strip is ending again. I can only hope it comes back in some new iteration in the future.
A few things in book 5 that I could never really wrap my head around:
"Project Hex" and the 23 members of the collective... I get that the basic idea was that they were linking their minds together to achieve higher mental potential, but I never quite understood why doing this gave them the power to reverse time or why they suddenly turned into a (or is it "the"?) 23-sider afterwards.
Also when Narbon realizes she was a creation of the God Machine... she's saying that the earlier prototype of the machine is what created her right? So if the prototype is still operational then why does she disappear when the "newer" God Machine is destroyed? Or was the implication that there never was a new god machine and the prototype WAS the one that was destroyed (meaning it was actually Fitz behind the whole incident)?
TCampbell wrote:I make no promises, one way or the other.
TCampbell wrote:The implication is that human mental potential, in a truly interlinked network, virtually has no upper limit.
TCampbell wrote:The prototype's function was supplanted by the newer device. She saw no reason to run both at once.
Bunny Suction wrote:TCampbell wrote:I make no promises, one way or the other.
Woo hoo! and/or doh!TCampbell wrote:The implication is that human mental potential, in a truly interlinked network, virtually has no upper limit.
So then turning into a 23-sider is what happens when a very very high degree of that potential is reached?TCampbell wrote:The prototype's function was supplanted by the newer device. She saw no reason to run both at once.
So if she was a figment created by the newer device then does that mean Fitz was the one running it? In other words, if she was a manifestation, then who actually made and turned on the machine?
T. Campbell (yeah, HIM) wrote:If Freemage did not exist, it might have been necessary to invent him.
dianekikiula wrote:My sig is jealous of your sig now.
Valerie wrote:
I'm leaving Paps for you.
Freemage, do you have a fanclub yet, and can I please join?
Freemage wrote:Bunny Suction wrote:TCampbell wrote:I make no promises, one way or the other.
Woo hoo! and/or doh!TCampbell wrote:The implication is that human mental potential, in a truly interlinked network, virtually has no upper limit.
So then turning into a 23-sider is what happens when a very very high degree of that potential is reached?TCampbell wrote:The prototype's function was supplanted by the newer device. She saw no reason to run both at once.
So if she was a figment created by the newer device then does that mean Fitz was the one running it? In other words, if she was a manifestation, then who actually made and turned on the machine?
I thought the newer one (without the limits) was made BY the prototype....
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest