Zanosuke Kurosaki wrote:Pink Freud wrote:I am a white, heterosexual, cisgendered, middle-class southern male.
In other words, I am everything that is wrong with the world.
I am so, so sorry.
No, thinking that we can pin the blame on what's wrong with the world on a single type or group, that's what's really wrong with the world.
That said, I'm a white, mostly heterosexual, cisgendered, lower-middle class* male who has lived a good portion of his life in the South but doesn't identify as Southern. My ancestry includes Irish on my mother's side from her father (not sure of maternal grandmother, have to ask), and English-Scottish on my male genetic donor's side (haven't dug much into that family history yet, either.)
*We used to be upper-lower-middle class, but my mother retired from the military as I got out of high school, so we lost that hyphen around said time. And no one will get that joke...
I get it! We fluctuated between middle and lower middle class for most of my childhood, so I totally get that.
That's exactly like what I said in my own post- the attitude that the very act of being {insert privileged group here} is ____ist against the non-privilege groups and has to be justified. It's frustrating, and all it does is slow down progress because it tends to get people defensive, and unwilling to listen. It's kinda like how Val put it in the OP, how there's a legitimate concern about minority-exclusive scholarships, but two different ways to put it- one that is just shouting about 'those people' and makes the speaker look like an ass, and one that is much more reasonable and easier to address and doesn't get everyone's hackles up. I know that I'm far more likely to listen and consider the situation rationally when it's pointed out in a way that doesn't stop short of accusing me of personally attempting to re-enslave the entire black population.
(Example: "You know, your cast of characters don't have any minorities in it. Maybe you should consider changing that, so that you can appeal to a wider audience, rather than alienate a pretty big chunk of your potential readers" is a lot easier to listen to and take seriously than "zOMG YOU DON'T HAZ BLACK PEOPLE YOU RACIST PIG YOU". I mean, how do you even respond to that?)
For the record, I'm not saying racism isn't a thing. It is. It's a big thing, and we should probably get round to fixing that because it's annoying all round. And I'm not saying that it shouldn't make people angry, because it should. Because no one really wins in the end. I guess what I'm saying is kinda the same thing I was saying about people who exhibit homophobic attitudes- it's something that gets through a lot easier with a rational argument (and the patience of a saint and the occasional The Reason You Suck speech) a lot easier than lots of shouting about how wrong they are. Especially if the person in question is on that side to begin with, they just occasionally forget to consider their own privilege in a given situation. ("Well, I don't see anything wrong with my cast! I can identify with all of them!" "Well, yes, you would, because all of them come from the same background as you. But someone from a different background wouldn't- that's why a diverse cast is best." "Oh! Well since you put it that way... yeah, I get that." Exaggerated simplicity, of course, but if only it were always so easy.)
