CEOIII wrote:As for 2: Cronenberg himself was at the party, or you were just watching his films? The first sounds OK, the second doesn't sound PTSD victim-friendly.
Someone please elaborate. (Yeah, I could google it, but you know, don't you?) Who's Cronenberg, what's PTSD, and why isn't the former good for the latter?
Valerie wrote: Ameyal wrote:
Adrishiana wrote:To be fair, I don't think someone spiking their popsicles with laxatives or whatever would make Lisa in the wrong. D:
Since it was her
idea to go that party wearing slutastic outfits, so everything that happens(good and bad) in that party will be her fault forever. forever
...I... You... You do realize how incredibly problematic it is to say that if you're serious, right?
I think the second forever
gives hir (?) away. S/he's about as serious as I was with my Tanny-[serious dislike].
I am using the nickname Tanny here, because I have recently started quite like Fiona. See, either she's one of the most no-filter-between-brain-and-mouth people I've never met (there a word for them?), or she's a devious, calculating people-reader. Either one's good for me, if it happens for my entertainment!
Jeez, I'm an awful person.Like you'd care.I'm sorry, Valerie.