[4 Jan 12] So very thirsty.

This forum is founded on discussions about T Campbell's work (alone and with artist partners).

Moderators: Gisele, TCampbell

[4 Jan 12] So very thirsty.

Postby Sri » Tue Jan 03, 2012 9:07 pm

So she went with Hans for Hank. I'm intrigued by Daniel though. I guess it could go through a Stan-Dan-Daniel permutation.
If men had wings and bore black feathers few of them would be clever enough to be crows. - Henry Beecher
User avatar
Sri
 
Posts: 139
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 9:28 am
Location: Inside my Head

Re: [4 Jan 12] So very thirsty.

Postby Alice Macher » Tue Jan 03, 2012 9:10 pm

I wonder whether Hank will even realize "Hans"=="Hank." Hans is a common enough German name, after all. Also, so far there aren't any stolen snippets of Hank's actual dialogue in there.

Nonetheless, Lisa's reaction means she assumes he's made the connection.

(Also, holy knickers, early update :/)
Last edited by Alice Macher on Tue Jan 03, 2012 9:16 pm, edited 2 times in total.
"Life doesn't wait forever." --Lisa Winklemeyer
User avatar
Alice Macher
 
Posts: 4420
Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 4:57 pm
Location: Toronto

Re: [4 Jan 12] So very thirsty.

Postby Tamar » Tue Jan 03, 2012 9:12 pm

I predict Hank won't have made the connection, and in fact will start to compliment Lisa on her writing, but then Lisa will blurt out "I'M SORRY FOR INSERTING YOU AS A CHARACTER OMFGBBQ" and then he'll get upset. :twisted:
Rebhel wrote:I happen to like Lisa BECAUSE of the way she speaks. If you don't get her, oh well... you are the one missing out.


Go ask Alice; I think she'll know.
User avatar
Tamar
 
Posts: 894
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2011 8:42 am
Location: Toronto

Re: [4 Jan 12] So very thirsty.

Postby Sri » Tue Jan 03, 2012 9:16 pm

Tamar wrote:I predict Hank won't have made the connection, and in fact will start to compliment Lisa on her writing, but then Lisa will blurt out "I'M SORRY FOR INSERTING YOU AS A CHARACTER OMFGBBQ" and then he'll get upset. :twisted:

My bet is he does a mild apology for reading her work without asking (his whole thing about privacy) and Lisa feels tortured both for inserting him in the story and for eavesdropping and eventually comes clean about both (not for a while though - that wouldn't be any fun :twisted: )
If men had wings and bore black feathers few of them would be clever enough to be crows. - Henry Beecher
User avatar
Sri
 
Posts: 139
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 9:28 am
Location: Inside my Head

Re: [4 Jan 12] So very thirsty.

Postby nymosy » Tue Jan 03, 2012 10:02 pm

oh my god

this is the worst nazi porn i've ever read
User avatar
nymosy
 
Posts: 137
Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2009 12:29 am

Re: [4 Jan 12] So very thirsty.

Postby NobodySpecial » Tue Jan 03, 2012 10:20 pm

Sri wrote:
Tamar wrote:I predict Hank won't have made the connection, and in fact will start to compliment Lisa on her writing, but then Lisa will blurt out "I'M SORRY FOR INSERTING YOU AS A CHARACTER OMFGBBQ" and then he'll get upset. :twisted:

My bet is he does a mild apology for reading her work without asking (his whole thing about privacy) and Lisa feels tortured both for inserting him in the story and for eavesdropping and eventually comes clean about both (not for a while though - that wouldn't be any fun :twisted: )


Nah, instead Lisa will (as most humans do) overreact in trying to get it out of Hank's hands and cause hard feelings not meaning to. Thus the drama.
"I've always been mad. I know I've been mad like the most of us have. Sometimes I don't know if I'm mad even if I'm not mad." - Jerry Driscoll
User avatar
NobodySpecial
 
Posts: 1156
Joined: Mon May 18, 2009 4:40 pm
Location: Northern Illinois

Re: [4 Jan 12] So very thirsty.

Postby SomeCanadianWeirdo » Tue Jan 03, 2012 10:54 pm

A bit of a longshot is that Hank will think this story is somehow about Sara, with Lisa changing her into a concentration camp inmate to hide the fact. Especially if he's got any idea that Sara didn't used to be Sara Kim.
SomeCanadianWeirdo
 
Posts: 396
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 1:47 am
Location: the Canadian Prairies

Re: [4 Jan 12] So very thirsty.

Postby Freemage » Tue Jan 03, 2012 11:45 pm

I don't know what's coming. I only know that Lisa's expression of terror is magnificent.
T. Campbell (yeah, HIM) wrote:If Freemage did not exist, it might have been necessary to invent him.

dianekikiula wrote:My sig is jealous of your sig now. :P
Valerie wrote:
I'm leaving Paps for you.
Freemage, do you have a fanclub yet, and can I please join?
User avatar
Freemage
 
Posts: 3606
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 1:58 pm
Location: Chicago

Re: [4 Jan 12] So very thirsty.

Postby Mr. Brightside » Tue Jan 03, 2012 11:48 pm

Sri wrote:So she went with Hans for Hank. I'm intrigued by Daniel though. I guess it could go through a Stan-Dan-Daniel permutation.


Don't see a Stan. Probably just that he's the archetypal romantic prisoner. (That or Joseph.)
(There has never been a signature.)
User avatar
Mr. Brightside
 
Posts: 2022
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 2:44 am

Re: [4 Jan 12] So very thirsty.

Postby CEOIII » Wed Jan 04, 2012 12:57 am

Mr. Brightside wrote:
Sri wrote:So she went with Hans for Hank. I'm intrigued by Daniel though. I guess it could go through a Stan-Dan-Daniel permutation.


Don't see a Stan. Probably just that he's the archetypal romantic prisoner. (That or Joseph.)


Well, if you squint, Daniel kinda resembles Stan. (Assuming the guy on the left, with his fist up to his mouth, is Daniel.)
I'm Charlie Owens, good night, and good luck.
User avatar
CEOIII
 
Posts: 821
Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 11:49 am
Location: Franklin, PA

Re: [4 Jan 12] So very thirsty.

Postby brasca » Wed Jan 04, 2012 1:50 am

Sri wrote:
Tamar wrote:I predict Hank won't have made the connection, and in fact will start to compliment Lisa on her writing, but then Lisa will blurt out "I'M SORRY FOR INSERTING YOU AS A CHARACTER OMFGBBQ" and then he'll get upset. :twisted:

My bet is he does a mild apology for reading her work without asking (his whole thing about privacy) and Lisa feels tortured both for inserting him in the story and for eavesdropping and eventually comes clean about both (not for a while though - that wouldn't be any fun :twisted: )


Or she does blurt out that she inserted him into her story, but that doesn't upset him. I don't see why it would since it's not like this work of fiction was created to torture Hank's stand in because Lisa hates him that much. Most writers write what they know and base their characters on people they've met.

And I agree with Freemage in digging Lisa's expression of terror. It's nice to see someone who thinks they know everything in a state of panic every once and awhile.
User avatar
brasca
 
Posts: 2501
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 12:57 pm
Location: Avondale, Arizona

Re: [4 Jan 12] So very thirsty.

Postby sun tzu » Wed Jan 04, 2012 5:17 am

Maybe it's the haircut, but I wasn't thinking "Stan" so much as "Jesse from Fans".
User avatar
sun tzu
 
Posts: 2032
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 3:16 pm

Re: [4 Jan 12] So very thirsty.

Postby Hexr » Wed Jan 04, 2012 6:48 am

Tamar wrote:OMFGBBQ

Oh my fucking God barbecue? I don't know why, but that cracked me up worse than Lisa's horrified expression. Speaking of which, I just might have a new avatar...
nymosy wrote:oh my god

this is the worst nazi porn i've ever read

My bet goes to it being because it was not intended to be nazi porn.
Gwen Cooper wrote:Excuse me. Have you seen a blowfish driving a sports car?

Seal Cubs Without Wings - where I rant about what pops to mind
User avatar
Hexr
 
Posts: 359
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2011 10:16 am

Re: [4 Jan 12] So very thirsty.

Postby Sri » Wed Jan 04, 2012 8:39 am

CEOIII wrote:
Mr. Brightside wrote:
Sri wrote:So she went with Hans for Hank. I'm intrigued by Daniel though. I guess it could go through a Stan-Dan-Daniel permutation.


Don't see a Stan. Probably just that he's the archetypal romantic prisoner. (That or Joseph.)


Well, if you squint, Daniel kinda resembles Stan. (Assuming the guy on the left, with his fist up to his mouth, is Daniel.)

Honestly I think he looks more like Jack but I was thinking of the permutation of names that might come up with Daniel.
If men had wings and bore black feathers few of them would be clever enough to be crows. - Henry Beecher
User avatar
Sri
 
Posts: 139
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 9:28 am
Location: Inside my Head

Re: [4 Jan 12] So very thirsty.

Postby Mec » Wed Jan 04, 2012 9:08 am

Sri wrote:
Tamar wrote:I predict Hank won't have made the connection, and in fact will start to compliment Lisa on her writing, but then Lisa will blurt out "I'M SORRY FOR INSERTING YOU AS A CHARACTER OMFGBBQ" and then he'll get upset. :twisted:

My bet is he does a mild apology for reading her work without asking (his whole thing about privacy) and Lisa feels tortured both for inserting him in the story and for eavesdropping and eventually comes clean about both (not for a while though - that wouldn't be any fun :twisted: )


I'll go along with that. Or, more generally, Hank will have a muted reaction, and Lisa will (continue to) freak out.

Lisa's hair continues to delight!
"The fair Ophelia! -- Nymph, in thy orisons be all my sins remembered."
Mec
 
Posts: 322
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2010 12:32 am
Location: Austin

Next

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests