Freemage wrote:Jerrbear: Thank you, for establishing once and for all, why Lesbians Are Hot.
Michael Ezra wrote:...Seriously, a MANNEQUIN? At this time, I can't help but recall JerrBear's words
Alice Macher wrote:Yeah, she's a real piece of work, bigoted and homophobic too.
Davidj wrote:Karen was neither of things.
Alice Macher wrote:Davidj wrote:Karen was neither of things.
I'm willing to concede the "homophobic" part (although she still bears responsibility for not talking her cohorts out of the video/poster idea), but as for her attitude toward Muslims, I present as evidence the exchange with Cyndi I referred to previously:
Karen: No way! No way!
Cyndi: Way way. [Duane's] quiet about it, but you can see him on the floor [praying] when he thinks no one's watching.
Karen: What, he decided being a nerd wasn't hateable enough?
Alice Macher wrote:That is correct, yes, but the point of disagreement is Karen's personal values and beliefs apart from what the IG did. Maybe we should settle this with naked chocolate pudding wrest--I mean by asking T about what prejudices, if any, Karen harboured.
Fen wrote:You know, I always thought of the Karen ending up taking the world comment as an exageration, which most people use all the time without really meaning it.
Alice Macher wrote:That is correct, yes, but the point of disagreement is Karen's personal values and beliefs apart from what the IG did. Maybe we should settle this with naked chocolate pudding wrest--I mean by asking T about what prejudices, if any, Karen harboured.
T. Campbell (yeah, HIM) wrote:If Freemage did not exist, it might have been necessary to invent him.
dianekikiula wrote:My sig is jealous of your sig now.
Valerie wrote:
I'm leaving Paps for you.
Freemage, do you have a fanclub yet, and can I please join?
Fen wrote:You know, I always thought of the Karen ending up taking the world comment as an exageration, which most people use all the time without really meaning it. I mean, technically it wasn't even Karen that brought Aggie to that state, Penny was talking abit out of her ass there to prove a point.
The point was that Karen was a bad person, currently affecting both of them. And yes, she's the kind of girl who seeks power by stomping on anything that she can. She would have ended up hurting other people, obviously. Not the world of course, but other people. They dealt with it briefly and it was quick, since karen was the type of girl to hit a downward spiral with the smallest of drawbacks.
Then again, they didn't know Cyndi back then. They assumed it was all Karen's fault and ideas being used. They wouldn't fathom Cyndi intentionally pushing Shelly into anorexia and Brandi into secluding herself from the group for one measly comment. It's not the kind of thing you'd imagine. They thought of her as Karen's pawn and nothing else. Same for Charlotte, Sam and all. They didn't even bother attacking them, since they assumed once Karen's out of they way her pawns would fall with her. Sure, WE knew Cyndi had her own plans, but they couldn't have known that.
It wasn't about Karen taking over the world, it was about Karen being a bitch that currently had power, and if they let her keep it she would hurt other people in the way. Hell, she was about to put Duane through a complete public humiliation and out him as a muslim, and given Belleville's extremely low tolerance and incredible ability to believe absolutely anything without a trace of doubt, that would've had dire consequences for him. Then they'd need a new enemy. They WERE right about that.
Meg was already out of the picture, Sam was too dumb to be anything but a pawn, Charlotte...well. Who takes her seriously anyway? The only mistake was that they underestimated Cyndi.Alice Macher wrote:That is correct, yes, but the point of disagreement is Karen's personal values and beliefs apart from what the IG did. Maybe we should settle this with naked chocolate pudding wrest--I mean by asking T about what prejudices, if any, Karen harboured.
TBH I always thought Karen hated everything she could. I've met a few people like that IRL. They cover up their insecurities by hating on the smallest of things. I knew a guy that loved to get into arguments so much he'd randomly take a side against whatever was discussed at the moment to piss off someone, if that person wasn't in his circle of friends. He'd be completely homophobic(despite always being very nice to the gay guy in our group), a Communist, pro-astrology and would often argue about irrelevant things. (like the correct way to name a singular version of a noun that is, without exception, always used as a plural. think pants)
Users browsing this forum: Valerie and 4 guests