Freemage wrote:Hey, for awhile there, it looked like we were well on the road to "Bush Girls Gone Wild, Vol. 1" (Hey, I woulda bought it...). Sadly, Dubya's handlers finally made him understand that it wouldn't play well in the heartland, and he threatened to cut off their credit cards if they kept getting busted for underage drinking.
daanton wrote:And here I thought it was for drug snorting... my mistake!
daanton wrote:DudeMyDadOwnsADealership wrote:daanton wrote:DudeMyDadOwnsADealership wrote:I recall the 90s being a time when PC called the shots and simply having a left-wing cause made you a saint regardless of any other details. Politics made sense then in much the same way the Feudal System made sense further back.
Frankly the idea of Chelsea becoming president creeps me out. Many people were sweet on that idea during the 90s because they were speculating based on the persona the media was creating for her at that time, at the demand of her mother. If she were to turn out well enough to move up in politics, I'd imagine she would display some of the traits Hillary possesses that have given her such notoriety.
Would you sooner have Chelsea or either of DUBYA's daughters??
Same dif.
Meaning...??
DudeMyDadOwnsADealership wrote:daanton wrote:DudeMyDadOwnsADealership wrote:daanton wrote:DudeMyDadOwnsADealership wrote:I recall the 90s being a time when PC called the shots and simply having a left-wing cause made you a saint regardless of any other details. Politics made sense then in much the same way the Feudal System made sense further back.
Frankly the idea of Chelsea becoming president creeps me out. Many people were sweet on that idea during the 90s because they were speculating based on the persona the media was creating for her at that time, at the demand of her mother. If she were to turn out well enough to move up in politics, I'd imagine she would display some of the traits Hillary possesses that have given her such notoriety.
Would you sooner have Chelsea or either of DUBYA's daughters??
Same dif.
Meaning...??
Meaning there isn't enough of a contrast between either of the debutante fatcat-seeds in terms of how screwed the country would be if either of them got Executive Branch power to really speak of.
daanton wrote:DudeMyDadOwnsADealership wrote:daanton wrote:DudeMyDadOwnsADealership wrote:daanton wrote:DudeMyDadOwnsADealership wrote:I recall the 90s being a time when PC called the shots and simply having a left-wing cause made you a saint regardless of any other details. Politics made sense then in much the same way the Feudal System made sense further back.
Frankly the idea of Chelsea becoming president creeps me out. Many people were sweet on that idea during the 90s because they were speculating based on the persona the media was creating for her at that time, at the demand of her mother. If she were to turn out well enough to move up in politics, I'd imagine she would display some of the traits Hillary possesses that have given her such notoriety.
Would you sooner have Chelsea or either of DUBYA's daughters??
Same dif.
Meaning...??
Meaning there isn't enough of a contrast between either of the debutante fatcat-seeds in terms of how screwed the country would be if either of them got Executive Branch power to really speak of.
Do you believe that of every president's duaghter(s) present and past??
Lamey wrote:Hey! When asked about his cocaine use Bush was adamant.
When asked if he had ever used cocaine he gave an emphatic, "no comment"
He did however specify that he had definately not used drugs within the 7 years previous to the 2000 election.
Clearly, he has never used cocaine.
iRobot wrote:Lamey wrote:Hey! When asked about his cocaine use Bush was adamant.
When asked if he had ever used cocaine he gave an emphatic, "no comment"
He did however specify that he had definately not used drugs within the 7 years previous to the 2000 election.
Clearly, he has never used cocaine.
Yeah, and Clinton didn't inhale, either.
mabarosi wrote:Guys... relax! It is only Clinton's daughter, it's not like she is really important in the grand scheme of things. I don't think not remembering whether she is his or Bush's daughter makes someone stupid. And it could definitely be said that politically speaking, Clinton's presidency was a long time ago - the American political situation (indeed, the whole world landscape) has certainly changed a great deal since then.
Actually, in Australia, people have a hard time remembering even the name of our Governor General (it's Michael Jeffery), let alone the names of our Prime Minister's children.
daanton wrote:iRobot wrote:Lamey wrote:Hey! When asked about his cocaine use Bush was adamant.
When asked if he had ever used cocaine he gave an emphatic, "no comment"
He did however specify that he had definately not used drugs within the 7 years previous to the 2000 election.
Clearly, he has never used cocaine.
Yeah, and Clinton didn't inhale, either.
And Nixon wasn't a crook.
mabarosi wrote:Guys... relax! It is only Clinton's daughter, it's not like she is really important in the grand scheme of things. I don't think not remembering whether she is his or Bush's daughter makes someone stupid. And it could definitely be said that politically speaking, Clinton's presidency was a long time ago - the American political situation (indeed, the whole world landscape) has certainly changed a great deal since then.
Actually, in Australia, people have a hard time remembering even the name of our Governor General (it's Michael Jeffery), let alone the names of our Prime Minister's children.
Marcik wrote:I thought that Chelsea is just name of the town where Penny lives. And the piece of paper says "here you are, standing here for over 40 years"
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests