Who's Chelsea?

This forum is founded on discussions about T Campbell's work (alone and with artist partners).

Moderators: Gisele, TCampbell

Postby Freemage » Wed Jan 31, 2007 10:42 pm

Hey, for awhile there, it looked like we were well on the road to "Bush Girls Gone Wild, Vol. 1" (Hey, I woulda bought it...). Sadly, Dubya's handlers finally made him understand that it wouldn't play well in the heartland, and he threatened to cut off their credit cards if they kept getting busted for underage drinking.
User avatar
Freemage
 
Posts: 3606
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 1:58 pm
Location: Chicago

Postby daanton » Thu Feb 01, 2007 10:12 am

Freemage wrote:Hey, for awhile there, it looked like we were well on the road to "Bush Girls Gone Wild, Vol. 1" (Hey, I woulda bought it...). Sadly, Dubya's handlers finally made him understand that it wouldn't play well in the heartland, and he threatened to cut off their credit cards if they kept getting busted for underage drinking.

And here I thought it was for drug snorting... my mistake!

Do we still hear about them in the news lately?
User avatar
daanton
 
Posts: 866
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 5:33 pm
Location: Canada

Postby iRobot » Thu Feb 01, 2007 5:37 pm

daanton wrote:And here I thought it was for drug snorting... my mistake!


I thought that was their dad....
Kyn, aka Brother Gatling Gun of Reasoned Discussion
-----
"You'll find a slight squeeze on the hooter an excellent safety precaution."
-- Caractacus Pott, Chitty Chitty Bang Bang
User avatar
iRobot
 
Posts: 607
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 9:41 am
Location: Florida, USA

Postby Lamey » Fri Feb 02, 2007 4:36 am

Hey! When asked about his cocaine use Bush was adamant.

When asked if he had ever used cocaine he gave an emphatic, "no comment"
He did however specify that he had definately not used drugs within the 7 years previous to the 2000 election.

Clearly, he has never used cocaine.
Lamey
 
Posts: 47
Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 8:34 am

Postby DudeMyDadOwnsADealership » Wed Feb 07, 2007 5:39 pm

daanton wrote:
DudeMyDadOwnsADealership wrote:
daanton wrote:
DudeMyDadOwnsADealership wrote:I recall the 90s being a time when PC called the shots and simply having a left-wing cause made you a saint regardless of any other details. Politics made sense then in much the same way the Feudal System made sense further back.

Frankly the idea of Chelsea becoming president creeps me out. Many people were sweet on that idea during the 90s because they were speculating based on the persona the media was creating for her at that time, at the demand of her mother. If she were to turn out well enough to move up in politics, I'd imagine she would display some of the traits Hillary possesses that have given her such notoriety.


Would you sooner have Chelsea or either of DUBYA's daughters??


Same dif.

Meaning...??


Meaning there isn't enough of a contrast between either of the debutante fatcat-seeds in terms of how screwed the country would be if either of them got Executive Branch power to really speak of.
CDEDBD Ducks
User avatar
DudeMyDadOwnsADealership
 
Posts: 511
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 4:21 pm

Postby daanton » Wed Feb 07, 2007 5:45 pm

DudeMyDadOwnsADealership wrote:
daanton wrote:
DudeMyDadOwnsADealership wrote:
daanton wrote:
DudeMyDadOwnsADealership wrote:I recall the 90s being a time when PC called the shots and simply having a left-wing cause made you a saint regardless of any other details. Politics made sense then in much the same way the Feudal System made sense further back.

Frankly the idea of Chelsea becoming president creeps me out. Many people were sweet on that idea during the 90s because they were speculating based on the persona the media was creating for her at that time, at the demand of her mother. If she were to turn out well enough to move up in politics, I'd imagine she would display some of the traits Hillary possesses that have given her such notoriety.


Would you sooner have Chelsea or either of DUBYA's daughters??


Same dif.

Meaning...??


Meaning there isn't enough of a contrast between either of the debutante fatcat-seeds in terms of how screwed the country would be if either of them got Executive Branch power to really speak of.

Do you believe that of every president's duaghter(s) present and past??
User avatar
daanton
 
Posts: 866
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 5:33 pm
Location: Canada

Postby DudeMyDadOwnsADealership » Thu Feb 08, 2007 9:02 am

daanton wrote:
DudeMyDadOwnsADealership wrote:
daanton wrote:
DudeMyDadOwnsADealership wrote:
daanton wrote:
DudeMyDadOwnsADealership wrote:I recall the 90s being a time when PC called the shots and simply having a left-wing cause made you a saint regardless of any other details. Politics made sense then in much the same way the Feudal System made sense further back.

Frankly the idea of Chelsea becoming president creeps me out. Many people were sweet on that idea during the 90s because they were speculating based on the persona the media was creating for her at that time, at the demand of her mother. If she were to turn out well enough to move up in politics, I'd imagine she would display some of the traits Hillary possesses that have given her such notoriety.


Would you sooner have Chelsea or either of DUBYA's daughters??


Same dif.

Meaning...??


Meaning there isn't enough of a contrast between either of the debutante fatcat-seeds in terms of how screwed the country would be if either of them got Executive Branch power to really speak of.

Do you believe that of every president's duaghter(s) present and past??


No.
CDEDBD Ducks
User avatar
DudeMyDadOwnsADealership
 
Posts: 511
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 4:21 pm

Postby iRobot » Thu Feb 08, 2007 9:41 pm

Lamey wrote:Hey! When asked about his cocaine use Bush was adamant.

When asked if he had ever used cocaine he gave an emphatic, "no comment"
He did however specify that he had definately not used drugs within the 7 years previous to the 2000 election.

Clearly, he has never used cocaine.


Yeah, and Clinton didn't inhale, either. :lol:
Kyn, aka Brother Gatling Gun of Reasoned Discussion
-----
"You'll find a slight squeeze on the hooter an excellent safety precaution."
-- Caractacus Pott, Chitty Chitty Bang Bang
User avatar
iRobot
 
Posts: 607
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 9:41 am
Location: Florida, USA

Postby daanton » Fri Feb 09, 2007 10:18 am

iRobot wrote:
Lamey wrote:Hey! When asked about his cocaine use Bush was adamant.

When asked if he had ever used cocaine he gave an emphatic, "no comment"
He did however specify that he had definately not used drugs within the 7 years previous to the 2000 election.

Clearly, he has never used cocaine.


Yeah, and Clinton didn't inhale, either. :lol:


And Nixon wasn't a crook. :roll:
User avatar
daanton
 
Posts: 866
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 5:33 pm
Location: Canada

Postby Kyrie Truant » Sat Feb 10, 2007 9:26 am

mabarosi wrote:Guys... relax! It is only Clinton's daughter, it's not like she is really important in the grand scheme of things. I don't think not remembering whether she is his or Bush's daughter makes someone stupid. And it could definitely be said that politically speaking, Clinton's presidency was a long time ago - the American political situation (indeed, the whole world landscape) has certainly changed a great deal since then.

Actually, in Australia, people have a hard time remembering even the name of our Governor General (it's Michael Jeffery), let alone the names of our Prime Minister's children.


This is America, though, and Americans in general do tend to get way too obsessed with anybody in the public sphere. (ex- and current) Presidents' children tend to be around tabloids just as much as other celebrities. Not that this means I condone any of it, just saying that it's not exactly like they're hidden away.
All she was in that $85,000 car could not exclude the little girl.

--

A fork in the road.
I take both.


--Mark Z. Danielewski
Kyrie Truant
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 10:58 am
Location: Kalamazoo, MI

Postby iRobot » Sun Feb 11, 2007 2:49 pm

daanton wrote:
iRobot wrote:
Lamey wrote:Hey! When asked about his cocaine use Bush was adamant.

When asked if he had ever used cocaine he gave an emphatic, "no comment"
He did however specify that he had definately not used drugs within the 7 years previous to the 2000 election.

Clearly, he has never used cocaine.


Yeah, and Clinton didn't inhale, either. :lol:


And Nixon wasn't a crook. :roll:


And we believe all three of these things. :wink:
Kyn, aka Brother Gatling Gun of Reasoned Discussion
-----
"You'll find a slight squeeze on the hooter an excellent safety precaution."
-- Caractacus Pott, Chitty Chitty Bang Bang
User avatar
iRobot
 
Posts: 607
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 9:41 am
Location: Florida, USA

Postby Marcik » Wed Jul 18, 2007 1:45 am

I thought that Chelsea is just name of the town where Penny lives. And the piece of paper says "here you are, standing here for over 40 years"
Marcik
 
Posts: 2
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 1:41 am
Location: Poland

Postby Davidj » Wed Jul 18, 2007 10:14 am

mabarosi wrote:Guys... relax! It is only Clinton's daughter, it's not like she is really important in the grand scheme of things. I don't think not remembering whether she is his or Bush's daughter makes someone stupid. And it could definitely be said that politically speaking, Clinton's presidency was a long time ago - the American political situation (indeed, the whole world landscape) has certainly changed a great deal since then.

Actually, in Australia, people have a hard time remembering even the name of our Governor General (it's Michael Jeffery), let alone the names of our Prime Minister's children.



They'd remember their names a lot better if his political enemies spent more time disparaging said children's looks and personality.
Davidj
 
Posts: 1767
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 3:06 pm

Postby idreamwideyed » Wed Jul 18, 2007 2:05 pm

Marcik wrote:I thought that Chelsea is just name of the town where Penny lives. And the piece of paper says "here you are, standing here for over 40 years"


that was my impression as well.
[somebody spoke ... and i went into a dream]
User avatar
idreamwideyed
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 2:03 pm

Postby Azrael44 » Fri Jul 20, 2007 6:41 am

Oy all.

Ok this is a thought that disturbs me greatly: In the last 20 years we in America have had 4 years of Bush the Elder, 8 years of Clinton, and 8 years of Bush the Younger. Ok now let us say Hilary actually gets elected and then re-elected. In this case this nation will have been ruler by the same two families for over a quarter of a century. This boggles my mind. Now to turn up the madness factor, how about Jeb in 2016? Chelsea in 2024? Where does it end? Just say no to dynastic politics :P *twitch*twitcher*twitchest*
"A friend is one who stabs you in the front"~ O. Wilde

Politics: n. pl. From the Gk "polus" meaning many and the OE "ticia" meaning bloodsucking insect.
User avatar
Azrael44
 
Posts: 986
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2007 11:19 am
Location: The dark side of the moon, where the red fern grows

PreviousNext

Return to General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests